Suggest a work, or a correction
This archive is meant to be corrected. If a work is missing, a source has rotted, a dependency is wrong, or a claim is overstated, tell us — with evidence.
What you can suggest
- A missing paper, report, dataset, benchmark, or open release
- A corrected date, author, venue, or identifier
- A broken or non-canonical source link
- A missing or mis-typed dependency between two works
- A better open implementation
- A licensing or open-source / open-weight correction
- A claim you think is overstated or unsupported
How it works
Every suggestion needs a primary-source link — the archive runs on evidence, not assertion. Submissions enter an editorial queue and are reviewed against the primary source before anything changes; nothing is published automatically or anonymously. If your suggestion is used, the record’s change log notes the correction. See the methodology for the evidence tiers and openness vocabulary we hold records to.